Search
My feed

PostRhetoric: (A) Discourse on Splintered Wood and Rusted Nails

A wooden post with staples
Multiple locations

walking as research.

Collection · 179 items

community

Collection · 217 items

place

Collection · 408 items

Writing

Collection · 228 items
Walking piece

The ubiquitous site for announcing yard sales and pleading for the return of lost cats, the utility pole is a monument to right-of-way messaging. Up close, we can see the detritus of rhetorics long past: rusted nails and staples, and worn out duct tape barely hanging on. Beyond its main purpose to deliver basic needs to neighborhoods — electricity, phone and cable service, a rest stop for birds — the utility pole stands as a palimpsest of a place to hang our words. It represents the ways we communicate with each other in vernacular, pedestrian approaches: the local convenience store window; the laundromat bulletin board; the cardboard box, weighed down with bricks, at the intersection of My Street and Main. They are mundane objects we use to desperately find that lost cat, or sell that car, or get side jobs. The utility pole, then, implicitly reflects a sense of community, of common purpose, of shared place. A palimpsest whose ruin documents a narrative about neighbors’ desires, needs, desperations. On this splintered wooden post, they become ghosts of discourse.

APA style reference

Lunsford, S. (2024). PostRhetoric: (A) Discourse on Splintered Wood and Rusted Nails. walk · listen · create. https://walklistencreate.org/walkingpiece/postrhetoric-a-discourse-on-splintered-wood-and-rusted-nails/

2 thoughts on “PostRhetoric: (A) Discourse on Splintered Wood and Rusted Nails

Leave a Reply

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

pedestrian acts

By de Certeau: In “Walking in the City”, de Certeau conceives pedestrianism as a practice that is performed in the public space, whose architecture and behavioural habits substantially determine the way we walk. For de Certeau, the spatial order “organises an ensemble of possibilities (e.g. by a place in which one can move) and interdictions (e.g. by a wall that prevents one from going further)” and the walker “actualises some of these possibilities” by performing within its rules and limitations. “In that way,” says de Certeau, “he makes them exist as well as emerge.” Thus, pedestrians, as they walk conforming to the possibilities that are brought about by the spatial order of the city, constantly repeat and re-produce that spatial order, in a way ensuring its continuity. But, a pedestrian could also invent other possibilities. According to de Certeau, “the crossing, drifting away, or improvisation of walking privilege, transform or abandon spatial elements.” Hence, the pedestrians could, to a certain extent, elude the discipline of the spatial order of the city. Instead of repeating and re-producing the possibilities that are allowed, they can deviate, digress, drift away, depart, contravene, disrupt, subvert, or resist them. These acts, as he calls them, are pedestrian acts.

Problem?

Encountered a problem? Report it to let us know.

  • Include the page on which you encountered the problem.
  • Describe what happened.
  • Describe what you expected to happen.