Search
My feed
Featured 25 Feb, 2021

Welcoming new SWS board members

board

After the fantastic insights provided by our rather amazing Sound Walk September Advisory Board members during 2020, we were sad to see two of them move on. However, we are also blessed to welcome no less than three new members to our board.

Our advisory board members come from a very broad cross-section of the worlds of walking- and sound-art. We meet up to six times per year to discuss possible directions and opportunities for walk · listen · create in general, and Sound Walk September in particular.

At the start of 2021, we had to say goodbye to Francesca Panetta and Maja Thomas.
While sad to see them go, we are also extremely excited to welcome John Drever, Annie Mahtani, and Andrea Zeffiro.

John is Professor of Acoustic Ecology and Sound Art at Goldsmiths, University of London, where he co-leads the Unit for Sound Practice Research (SPR). He is Goldsmiths’ academic lead for the PhD consortium, CHASE.

Annie is a Lecturer in Music at the University of Birmingham. She is co-director of SOUNDkitchen, a Birmingham-based collective of curators, producers and performers of live electronic music and sound art. She is currently a committee member for the British ElectroAcoustic Network (BEAN), and Chair of the British Section of the International Society for Contemporary Music (ISCM).

Andrea is Academic Director for the Sherman Centre for Digital Scholarship and Assistant Professor in the Department of Communication Studies and Media Arts at McMaster University, Canada. 

John Levack Drever

John Levack Drever

 
Annie Mahtani

Annie Mahtani

(United Kingdom) 
Andrea Zeffiro

Andrea Zeffiro

 

Old hands

John, Annie and Andrea will strengthen the board, accompanying Josh Kopeçek, Julie Poitras Santos, Hamish Sewell, and Duncan Speakman in their roles as advisors to Sound Walk September.

What’s in the cards for this year?

We still can’t be sure to what extent COVID will influence our lives this September. It’s possible some of us will still be somewhat restricted in their movements by the end of the year. We will plan accordingly.

Meanwhile, we’ve got a number of connected ideas we are looking to implement, both virtual and physical. We’re also in exploratory talks that would see cooperations with artist in residency programs around the world.

Watch this space.

APA style reference

Fakhamzadeh, B. (2021). Welcoming new SWS board members. walk · listen · create. https://walklistencreate.org/2021/02/25/welcoming-new-sws-board-members/

Leave a Reply

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

pedestrian acts

By de Certeau: In “Walking in the City”, de Certeau conceives pedestrianism as a practice that is performed in the public space, whose architecture and behavioural habits substantially determine the way we walk. For de Certeau, the spatial order “organises an ensemble of possibilities (e.g. by a place in which one can move) and interdictions (e.g. by a wall that prevents one from going further)” and the walker “actualises some of these possibilities” by performing within its rules and limitations. “In that way,” says de Certeau, “he makes them exist as well as emerge.” Thus, pedestrians, as they walk conforming to the possibilities that are brought about by the spatial order of the city, constantly repeat and re-produce that spatial order, in a way ensuring its continuity. But, a pedestrian could also invent other possibilities. According to de Certeau, “the crossing, drifting away, or improvisation of walking privilege, transform or abandon spatial elements.” Hence, the pedestrians could, to a certain extent, elude the discipline of the spatial order of the city. Instead of repeating and re-producing the possibilities that are allowed, they can deviate, digress, drift away, depart, contravene, disrupt, subvert, or resist them. These acts, as he calls them, are pedestrian acts.

Problem?

Encountered a problem? Report it to let us know.

  • Include the page on which you encountered the problem.
  • Describe what happened.
  • Describe what you expected to happen.